Informational, Experiential Connections
Neural or global, we are talking about networks. Where do we delineate the boundries? Recent discoveries of the similarity between human brain and computer data storage have led to a notion of bionic-cybernetic connections already in place today. Information can originate from either cyber or neural networks. Moving information from neural networks to cybernetworks is trivial. We input data in our daily lives. It is either deliberately injected into our computer systems and networks or our behavior is captured by data-gathering activities (Internet, media & consumer behaviours) beyond our control. Information and knowledge can come to us through diverse media with the last mile being an analog transducer (TV, CD, DVD, Radio, Phone) or a digital computer.
I/O’s
Right now, devoid of direct computer interfaces to our own neural networks, we are dependant upon sensory i/o’s. The fidelity of these sensors depends on analog factors having to do with visual, aural and in some cases tactile stimuli, offering a slightly different experience for each individual. To correct for this ‘error’ requires overhead to calibrate or agree on references to color, tone, meaning and a host of other variations in our experience. With a unified experience, a pure information transfer would take place.
Different Takes
Don’t forget how diverse points of view (object - vantage point - perspective) make for creative scenarios when solving problems. However, knowledge shared does not always result in a consensus.
Definition at the outset, offers the potential for a progressive approach to be taken with group input, forward progress, critique, modification, and perfection. By reaching a consensus on the facts, the group can build a complex idea upon a solid foundation.
Interface
Linking of neural with cyber networks is taking place every day. A user, inputting data from their mind to a digital document on their computer completes the act of interfacing bio and cyber systems. This hybrid network consisting of a conceptual bridge between personal knowledge and Internet Web knowledge is unique for each individual.
Multi-Point Connection of Unique Hybrid Networks
Linking of personal hybrid networks in a multi-point connection results in scalable group structures. These structures can map onto various communications models. If for analysis, construction or problem-solving, the group benefits from the combined knowledge and input of the members. The result is for multiplicative deductive, associative and intuitive degrees of discovery and fulfills the sum-greater-than-parts expectation.
Mapping of Group Structures to a Scalable Communications Model
The individuals join a voice-only teleconference. Each maintains a detached (from each other) connection to their personal computer and network databases. A roundtable discussion ensues where individuals are calling up private data to expound on the subject at hand. With tight focus on a topic, google searches pull up the same information for all group members almost simultaneously. Group knowledge is not improved but a consensus is reached.
Next, the group scribbles notes, and critical feedback on a shared bulletin board. This is done asynchronously and at their leisure. This develops as an async chat room would. Each return visit to the board will show progressively critical feedback with improvement in consensus.
At some point an evolutionary concept emerges that was a product of the baseline state. This could not have emerged without the exercise of perfecting the baseline.
Finally, the group rolls the board and all live conference minutes up into a shared workspace or virtual think-tank. Now they can communicate live, capture all interactions and retrieve and share all live, online and archived data sources for all to see.